From hkk@netcom.comSun Oct 13 14:18:36 1996 Return-Path: Received: from netcom23.netcom.com (netcom23.netcom.com [192.100.81.137]) by athene.tertius.net.au (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id MAA07435 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 1996 12:26:28 +1000 Received: (from hkk@localhost) by netcom23.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom) id SAA06886; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 18:15:56 -0700 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 18:15:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Helena Kobrin Subject: Your Posting To: fun@athene.glasswings.com.au Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 2410 Dear Mr. Gerard: I represent Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), the owner of the confidential Advanced Technology of the religion of Scientology, and the holder of the exclusive rights under the copyrights applicable to the Advanced Technology materials. You have posted to alt.religion.scientology (message ID 53k2eO$1nj@news.mel.aone.net.au), portions of a court decision by Judge Leonie Brinkema in a case in which RTC is the plaintiff. That court decision is currently under seal pending further attention by the Court as to matters raised by RTC in a motion to the Court. A copy of the sealing order is at the bottom of this message. I therefore request that you cancel this message immediately. I am separately e-mailing your systems administrator and requesting that the message be cancelled. Sincerely, Helena Kobrin IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 95-1107-A ARNALDO PAGLIARINI LERMA, Defendant. ORDER Upon ex parte motion of the plaintiff, Religious Technology Center to redact certain langauge from the memorandum opinion issued by this Court on October 4, 1996 and IT APPEARING that this language may be part of the trade secrets at issue in this case and that it is part of the unpublished works protected by copyright and, IT FURTHER APPEARING that only counsel for the Religious Technology Center and Mr. Arnaldo Pagliarini Lerma pro se have copies of this memorandum opinion, IT IS ORDERED that the memorandum opinion be sealed and that the parties do not disseminate this opinion to any other persons or entities until further order of this Court. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record and to defendant, pro se. Entered this 8 day of October, 1996. _____/S/_____________________ United States District Judge Alexandria, Virginia